Evaluasi Struktural Perkerasan Kaku Menggunakan Metoda AASHTO 1993 Dan Metoda AUSTROADS 2011 Studi Kasus : Jalan Cakung-Cilincing

Shinta Rahmalia Irawan • Bambang Sugeng Subagio • Eri Susanto Hariyadi • Faisal Gerardo
Journal article Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB • 2017 Indonesia

Unduh teks lengkap
(Bahasa Indonesia, 10 pages)

Abstrak

Cakung-Cilincing Jakarta National Road Section has very rapid traffic load for rigid pavement. The purpose of this study are determining overlay thickness and choosing suitable method for implementation. AASHTO 1993 and AUSTROADS 2011 method are used in this study and using on Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) data. This study shows that value of Concrete Elasticity Modulus less than 3 million, then this rigid pavement is severely damaged. Based on AASHTO 1993 Method analysis, it needs 11 cm for flexible overlay and 12 cm for rigid overlay on lane 1 with 59% remaining life and lane 2 with 53% remaining life. AUSTROADS 2011 Methods use only FWD data and for overlay thickness determination is use new pavement analysis. Analysis using AUSTROADS 2011 Methods shows that flexible overlay requirement is 24 cm and rigid overlay requirement is 18.50 cm. Comparation between these two methods shows that AASHTO 1993 Method Analysis produce less overlay thickness than AUSTROADS 2011 Methods.

Metrik

  • 321 kali dilihat
  • 150 kali diunduh

Jurnal

Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB

Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan berkala setiap tiga bulan, yaitu... tampilkan semua