Human Development Index (HDI) is one of important multi dimension indicators that has been used to monitor population life development based on three dimensions (health, education and adequate living standard). Ministry of Health developed an Public Health Development Index (PHDI) in 2008 and 2014 that covered 30 selected health indicators, to support the health dimension of HDI. This paper used secondary data analysis of PHDI aimed to compare alternative of PHDI formulation method using geometric and arithmatic means.The analysis used data of Indonesia 2013 HDI from Central Bureau Statistic (BPS) Indonesia and 2013 districts PHDI from NIHRD MoH. Result of this study showed statistically difference results of PHDI between geometric mean equation and arithmetic mean equation, which was showing only very few districts remains in the same index range. The geometric mean equation showed slightly higher correlation between PHDI and HDI compare to the arithmetic mean equation. The geometric mean equation in PHDI formulation showed more stable index toward extreme value of its indicator components. The results implicate that the PHDI consider all of the constructed indicators in more equal way.